• God is No Where, Life in Now Here.
    - Osho

open all | close all

oshofriends




oshofriends

 

 

 

See Your Inner Being in Detail

 

 

The first technique:

EYES CLOSED, SEE YOUR INNER BEING IN DETAIL. THUS SEE YOUR TRUE NATURE.
 


Eyes closed… Close your eyes. But this closing is not enough. Total closing means to close your eyes and stop their movements; otherwise the eyes will continue to see something which is of the outside. Even with closed eyes you will see things – images of things. Actual things are not there, but images, ideas, collected memories – they will start flowing. They are also from outside, so your eyes are still not totally closed. Totally closed eyes means nothing to see.


Understand the difference. You can close your eyes; that is easy, everyone closes them every moment. In the night you close your eyes, but that will not reveal the inner nature to you. Close your eyes so that nothing remains to be seen – no outside object, no inside image of any outside object, just a blank darkness as if you have suddenly gone blind. Not blind only to reality, but to the dream reality also.


One has to practice it. A long period will be needed; it cannot be done suddenly. You will need a long training. Close your eyes. Anytime you feel that it is easy and you have time, close your eyes and then inwardly stop all movements of the eyes. Do not allow any movement. Feel! Do not allow any movement. Stop all movements of the eyes. Feel as if they have become stones, and then remain in that “stoney” state of the eyes. Do not do anything; just remain there. Suddenly, someday, you will become aware that you are looking inside yourself.


You can go just outside this building, move around the building and have a look, but that is looking at the building from the outside. Then you can enter into the room and you can stand in this room and have a look. That is looking at the building from the inside. When you are taking a round outside, you see the walls, but only one side; (The walls are the same, but) then you are seeing the outside of the walls. When you come in, the walls are the same, but now you will see the inside of the walls.


You have seen your body only from the outside. You have seen your body in a mirror or you have seen your hands from the outside. You do not know what the inside of your body is. You have never entered into your own self; you have never been at the center of your body and being, to look around at what is there from the inside.


This technique is very helpful for having a look from the inside, and that transforms your total consciousness, your total existence – because if you can have a look from the inside, you immediately become different from the world. This false identity that “I am the body” is only because we have been looking at our bodies from the outside. If you can have a look from the inside, the looker becomes different. And then you can move your consciousness in your body, from your toe to your head; you can now have a round inside the body. And once you become capable of having a look from the inside and moving there, then it is not difficult to go outside at all.


Once you know how to move, once you know that you are separate from the body, you are freed from a great bondage. Now you have no gravitational pull; now you have no limitation. Now you are absolute freedom. You can go out of the body; you can go and come. And then your body becomes just an abode.


Close your eyes, see your inner being in detail and move from limb to limb inside. Just go to your toe. Forget the whole body: move to the toe. Stay there and have a look. Then move through the legs, come on upwards, go to every limb. Then many things happen. Many things happen!


Then your body becomes such a sensitive vehicle, you cannot even imagine it. Then if you touch someone, you can move into your hand totally and that touch will become transforming. That is what is meant by a master’s touch: he can move to any limb totally, and then he is concentrated there. If you can move to any part of your body totally, that part becomes alive – so much alive that you cannot imagine what happens to that part. Then you can move to the eyes totally. If you can move to your eyes totally and then look into someone’s eyes, you will penetrate him; you will go to his very depths.


Now psychoanalysts are trying to go to the depths through psychoanalysis. Then they take one year, two years, three years… This is a sheer wastage of time. And life is so short that if three years are taken to analyze a person’s mind, it is nonsense. And then too you cannot rely on whether the analysis is complete or not. You are groping in the dark. The Eastern approach has been through the eyes. No need of analyzing the person for such a long time. The work can be done by just entering through his eyes totally, touching his depths, knowing many things about him of which even he is not aware.


The master has many things to do. One of the basic things is this: to analyze you, to go deep into you, to move into your darker realms which are unknown to you. And if he says to you that something is hidden in you, you will not believe it. How can you believe it? You are not aware of it. You know only one part of the mind – a very small fragment which is just the upper part, just the first layer. Behind it there are hidden nine layers which are not known to you, but through your eyes a penetration is possible.


Close your eyes; See your inner being in detail. The first, outer part of the technique is to look at your body inwardly – from your inner center. Stand there and have a look. You will be separated from the body because the looker is never the looked at. The observer is different from the object.


If you can see your body totally from the inside, then you can never fall into the illusion that you are the body. Then you will remain different – totally different: inside it but not it, in the body but not the body. This is the first part. Then you can move; then you are free to move. Once freed from the body, freed from the identity, you are free to move. Now you can move into your mind – deep down. Those nine layers which are within and unconscious can now be entered into.


This is the inner cave of the mind. If you enter this cave of the mind, you will become separate from the mind also. Then you will see that the mind is also an object which you can look at, and that which is entering the mind is, again, separate and different. This entering into the mind is what is meant by: See your inner being in detail. Body and mind both should be entered and looked at from within. Then you are simply a witness, and this witness cannot be penetrated.


That is why it is your innermost core: that is you. That which can be penetrated, that which can be seen, is not you. When you have come to that which cannot be penetrated, that in which you cannot move, which cannot be observed, then only have you come to the real self. You cannot witness the witnessing source, remember – that is absurd.


If someone says that “I have witnessed my witness,” that is absurd. Why is it absurd? Because if you have witnessed your witnessing self, then the witnessing self is not the witnessing self. That who has witnessed it is the witness. That who you can see, you are not; that which you can observe, you are not; that which you can become aware of, you are not.


But a point comes beyond the mind where simply you are. Now you cannot divide your single existence into two: object and subject. Simple subjectivity is there, just witnessing. This is very, very difficult to comprehend through intellect because all the categories of the intellect are broken there.


Because of this logical difficulty, Charwak – the expounder of one of the most logical philosophical systems in the world – says that you cannot know the self; there is no self-knowledge. And because there is no self-knowledge, how can you say that there is a elf? Whatsoever you know is not the self. The knower is the self, not the known, so you cannot say logically that “I have known my self.” That is absurd, illogical. How can you know your self? Then who will be the knower and who will be the known? Knowledge means a dichotomy, a division between object and subject, the knower and the known.


So Charwak says that all those who say they have known the self are talking nonsense. Self-knowledge is impossible because the self is irreducibly the knower. It cannot be converted into the known.


Then Charwak says that if you cannot know the self, how can you say that there is self? Those like Charwak, who do not believe in the presence of a self, are called Anatmavadin. They say no self is; they say there is no self – that which cannot be known is not. And they are right logically. If logic is all, they are right. But this is the mystery of life, that logic is only the beginning – not the end. A moment comes when logic ends, but you do not end. A moment comes when logic is finished, but you are still there. Life is illogical. That is why it is difficult to comprehend, to conceive of what is meant when it is said that only the witness remains.


For example, if there is a lamp in this room, you see many objects around you. When the lamp is turned off, there is darkness and nothing can be seen. When the lamp is put on, there is light and you can see everything in the room. But have you ever observed what is happening? If there are no objects, will you be able to see the lamp and its light? You will not be able to see its light, because to be seen the light must reflect something. It must strike an object. The rays must go to an object and then be reflected, then they will reach to your eyes. So first you see objects, then you infer that light is there. When you burn a lamp or a candle, you never see the light first. First you see the objects, and because of the objects you come to know about the light.


Scientists say that if there are no objects then light cannot be seen. Look at the sky: it looks blue but it is not blue, it is filled with cosmic rays. It looks blue because there are no objects. Those rays cannot reflect and come to your eyes. If you go into space and there are no objects, then there will be darkness. Of course, rays will be passing just by your side, but there will be darkness. To know the light some objects have to be there.


Charwak says that if you enter within and come to the point where only the witness has remained and there is nothing to be witnessed, how can you know about it? Some object must be there to be witnessed; only then can you know the witnessing. Logically, scientifically, it is right. But existentially it is not right.


Those who really move inside come to a point where there is no object left but just the consciousness of being. You are, but nothing is there to be seen – only the seer. ONLY the seer! There is simple subjectivity without any object around it. The moment you come to this point, you have entered your ultimate goal of being. You can call it the alpha – the beginning, or you can call it the omega – the end. It is both, alpha and omega. This is called “self-knowledge.”


Linguistically the word is wrong because linguistically nothing can be said about it. Language becomes meaningless when you enter the world of the one. Language is meaningful only when you are in the world of two. In the world of duality language is meaningful because language is created in, is part of the dualistic world. It becomes meaningless when you enter the one, the non-dual. That is why those who know have remained silent – or even if they say something they hurriedly add that whatsoever they are saying is just symbolic, and whatsoever they are saying is not exactly true: it is false.


Lao Tzu said that that which can be said cannot be true, and that which is true cannot be said. He remained silent; for most of his life he would not write anything. He said, “If I say something it will be untrue, because nothing can be said about the realm where only the One remains.”


Eyes closed, see your inner being in detail – body and mind both. Thus see your true nature. See your body and mind, your structure. And remember, body and mind are not two things. Rather, you are both: body-mind – psychosomatic. Mind is the finer part of the body and body is the grosser part of the mind.


So if you can become aware of the structure of body-mind, if you can become conscious of the structure, you are freed from the structure, you are freed from the vehicle, you have become different. And this knowing that you are separate from the structure is your true nature. That is what you really are. This body will die, but that true nature never dies. This mind will die and change, and die again and again, but that true nature never dies. That true nature is eternal. That is why that true nature is neither your name nor your form. It is beyond both.


So how to do this technique? Total closing of the eyes is needed. If you try it, close your eyes and then stop the movements. Let your eyes become just like stones. No movements allowed. Suddenly, any day while practicing this, suddenly it will happen that you will be able to look within. The eyes which were always looking outside will turn in and you will have a glimpse inside.


Then there is no difficulty. Once you have the glimpse inside, you know what to do and how to move. Only the first glimpse is difficult; after that you have the knack. Then it becomes just like a trick. Any moment you can close your eyes, make your eyes static, and you can enter the realm.


Buddha was dying. It was the last day of his life, and he asked his disciples if they wanted to ask any questions. They were weeping, crying, and they said, “You have told us so much. Now nothing is left to ask.” Buddha had a habit of asking thrice. He would never stop after asking once. He would ask again, and then he would ask still again whether you had any question to ask. Many times Buddha was asked, “Why do you ask a single thing three times?” He said, “Because man is so unaware, so unconscious, he may not have heard the first time and he may have missed the second time.”


Thrice he asked, and thrice his bhikkhus, monks, his disciples said; “Now we do not want to ask anything. You have said so much.” Then he closed his eyes and said, “If you do not have anything to ask, before death occurs to the body I will move from it. Before death enters the body I will move from it.”


He closed his eyes. His eyes became static and he started moving. It is said that there were four parts to his movement inwards. First he closed his eyes; secondly, his eyes became static, there were no movements. If you had then the instrument for recording R.E.M., the graph would not have come. The eyes became static – that was the second thing. Thirdly, he looked at his body; then fourthly, he looked at his mind.


This was the whole journey. Before death occurred he was back at his center, in his original source. That is why this death is not called death: we call it nirvana, and this is the difference. We call it nirvana – cessation – not death. Ordinarily, we die because death occurs to us. It never occurred to Buddha. Before death came, he had already returned to the source.


Death occurred only to the dead body – he was not there to be found. So in Buddhist tradition it is said that he never died. Death could not catch him. It followed as it follows him everyone, but he could not be trapped; he tricked Death out of it. He must have been laughing – standing beyond, and Death was there only with a dead body.


This technique is the same. Make four parts of it and move. And when you know one glimpse, the whole thing will become very easy and simple. Then any moment you can move in and come out, and go in and come out, just like coming out of your house and going in… coming out and going in.

 

-Osho, "The Book of Secrets, #21"

 

 

TAG •

  1. No Image

    Tantric analyses of the sex act : Three figures

    There are three possibilities. Two lovers meeting can create three figures -- geometrical figures. You may have even read about it or even seen an old alchemical picture in which a man and woman are standing naked within three geometrical figures. One figure is...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  2. No Image

    Inner and Outer Love Affair

    Question 3 Osho, Do i rightly understand you that if you and your beloved can transmute your sexual energy into spirituality, that this relationship will not be satisfying either? your seeming contradictions on love confuse me. Nellie, confusion is my way of wo...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  3. No Image

    on Sex, Tantra and Bhahmacharya

    Tantra is science. Tantra says first know what the reality is, what man is, and don’t create values and don’t create ideals right now: first know what is. Do not think of the ”ought”; just think of the ”is.” And once the ”is” is known, then you change it. Then ...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  4. No Image

    Osho on Tantra

    Osho on Tantra Tantra Is the Science of Transforming Ordinary Lovers Into Soul Mates In the East we have developed a science: if you cannot find a soulmate, you can create one. And that science is Tantra. To find a soulmate means to find the person with whom al...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  5. No Image

    Don´t condemn sensuality.

    Sensuality Don't condemn sensuality. It has been condemned by the whole world, and because of their condemnation the energy that can flower in sensuality moves into perversions, jealousy, anger, hatred -- a kind of life which is dry, with no juice. Sensuousness...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  6. No Image

    Tantra - Osho Quotes on Tantra

    Osho Quotes on Tantra Tantric experience means neither to be repressive nor to be indulgent. Tantric experience is possible only if you move deep into meditation, otherwise not. When you become very very still, silent, aware, alert, then only is it possible tha...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  7. No Image

    on Yoga and Tantra - Tantra is complementary to Yoga

    Question 5 Is it possible to find a synthesis between yoga and tantra? does one lead to another? No, it is impossible. It is as impossible as if you try to find a synthesis between man and woman. Then what will be the synthesis? -- third sex, an impotent person...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  8. No Image

    Without making an effort, but Remaining Loose and Natural

    MAHAMUDRA RESTS ON NOUGHT. WITHOUT MAKING AN EFFORT, BUT REMAINING LOOSE AND NATURAL.... And this is the whole method of Tilopa, and the whole method of Tantra: WITHOUT MAKING AN EFFORT... because if you make an effort, the ego is strengthened. If you make an e...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  9. No Image

    Shortcoming in Tantra Teachings : Tantra Failed for Two Reasons

    Question 3 : Beloved Osho, Do You see shortcoming in the Teachings of Tantra that incline you to feel Tantric methods are not suitable for us? It is not a complete system. There is a basic fallacy that human beings fall into: they find a small truth, a part of ...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  10. No Image

    Only if Love Allows

    Only if Love Allows Question 1 : Beloved Osho, What are your views on sexual ethics? My views on sexual ethics are against all the views that have been held up to now. They were all repressive of sex; they were condemnatory and created a split in the human mind...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  11. No Image

    Tantra is not teaching sexuality. It is simply saying that sex can be a source of bliss.

    Tantra is not teaching sexuality. It is simply saying that sex can be a source of bliss. And once you know that bliss, you can go further because now you are grounded in reality. One is not to remain with sex forever, but you can use sex as a jumping point. Tha...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  12. No Image

    Tantra is not a moral concept. It is neither moral nor immoral. It is amoral. It is a science

    Before I take your questions some other points have to be clarified, because those points will help you understand more what tantra means. Tantra is not a moral concept. It is neither moral nor immoral. It is amoral. It is a science, and science is neither. You...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  13. No Image

    What is the difference between traditional yoga and tantra?

    Question 1: What is the difference between traditional yoga and tantra? are they the same? Tantra and yoga are basically different. They reach to the same goal; however, their paths are not only different, but contrary also. So this has to be understood very cl...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  14. No Image

    The word 'tantra' means the capacity of expansion

    When sex is just an unconscious, mechanical urge in you, it is wrong. Remember, sex is not wrong: the mechanicalness of it is wrong. If you can bring some light of intelligence into you sexuality, that light will transform it. It will not be sexuality any more ...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  15. No Image

    Tantra definition of our sexuality : The return to absolute innocence, absolute oneness.

    Tantra says: The appeal of sex is because it gives you a moment of egolessness, timelessness, meditation. Because of ego-gratification, sex has become very very superficial, it only scratches the skin. It does not go deep, it has no depth. So many people are wo...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  16. No Image

    Tantra uses sex as a vehicle. It is energy; it can be used as a vehicle

    The third sutra: "EVEN REMEMBERING UNION, WITHOUT THE EMBRACE, THE TRANSFORMATION!" Once you know this, even the partner is not needed. You can simply remember the act and enter into it. But first you must have the feeling. If you know the feeling, you can ente...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  17. No Image

    The tantric orgasm - A valley orgasm.

    Question 2 How often should one indulge in sex in order to help and not to hinder the meditation process?" The question arises because we go on misunderstanding. Your sex act and the tantric sex act are basically different. Your sex act is to relieve; it is jus...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  18. No Image

    Tantra says no strain is needed; be relaxed with the other. In that relaxed moment the other disappears and your energy can flow up

    Question 3 If one experiences kundalini -- the rising of energy up the spinal passage -- does not it deplete one's meditative energies to have orgasm? All the questions are basically without understanding of what the tantric sex act is. Ordinarily, it is so. If...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  19. No Image

    All that is beautiful is sexual

    Question 1 I was doing sadhana under the guidance of some other teacher. At that time i had no problem of sex. But tensions existed there in my mind. After coming to your shelter tensions have disappeared but a new problem of sex has arisen. Due to sex a new te...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  20. No Image

    Only two independent persons can love

    [A sannyasin married couple bring their one-year-old daughter for sannyas.] Deva tara... It means divine star. Tar means star, mm? -- the english word 'star' comes from the sanskrit root 'tara'. In sanskrit it is 'sitara'; from sitara it has become tara in Hind...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  21. No Image

    on Eroticism : Khajuraho or Konarak… these are not pornographic

    Question 3 Beloved Osho, In the west, the portrayal of woman’s body is used in films, books and magazines. This art form is known as ‘eroticism’. Through the sculptures of khajuraho and ajanta i have seen that a similar art form was there in the east. Can you t...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  22. No Image

    The whispered transmission

    Question 4: Osho, Why did the great masters of tantra call their teaching "the whispered transmission"? The system of tantra is one of the most important things that has ever happened in the history of man. Everything else is secondary because tantra is an effo...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  23. No Image

    This Consciousness Exists as Each Being

    This Consciousness Exists as Each Being This consciousness exists as each being, and nothing else exists. Scientists used to say in the past that only matter existed, nothing else. Great systems of philosophy arose based on the concept that only matter existed....
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  24. No Image

    Tantra uses the word “sex” wherever the opposites meet

    Question1 : Osho, We have always heard that tantra is basically concerned with sex energy and sex center techniques, but you say that Tantra is all inclusive. If there is any truth in the former standpoint, the majority of techniques in Vigyana Bhairava seem to...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  25. No Image

    Tantra is science, Tantra is not philosophy

    TANTRA means technique. So this treatise is a scientific one. Science is not concerned with why, science is concerned with how. That is the basic difference between philosophy and science. Philosophy asks, "Why this existence?" Science asks, "How this existence...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  26. No Image

    The basic problem of love is to first become mature

    You can go on changing your husband or your wife a thousand and one times, you will again find the same type of woman and the same misery repeated in different forms – but the same misery repeated; it is almost the same. You can change your wife, but you are no...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  27. No Image

    on Tantra - Tantra is the science of transforming ordinary lovers into soulmates

    Question 2 : Osho, To find a soulmate sounds nice, but almost impossible. would you please say something more about it? and how can it even come close to finding a master? It is certainly almost impossible to find the soulmate - even if all facilities are avail...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  28. No Image

    Ardhanarishwara : Half Man and Half Woman

    Question 3: You have said that a man is sixty percent male and forty percent female, and a woman is sixty percent female and forty percent male. in case the ratio is altered and equalized, do you think male and female energies will neutralize and sterilize each...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  29. No Image

    Tantra is the highest form of love. Tantra is the science, the yoga of love

    Tantra is the highest form of love. Tantra is the science, the yoga of love Question : Beloved Osho, The ultimate search is Individual, But can you explain the integral part of the Beloved in Tantra and the search for our inner self? A very intricate, complex t...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  30. No Image

    on Tantric Sex

    Tantric sex is not sex at all; it is meditation. Meditation has to spread all over your life. Whatsoever you do, do meditatively. Walk meditatively, eat meditatively. If you are making love, make love meditatively. Meditation has to become your life twenty-four...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  31. No Image

    Tao has its own tantra. But it is not technique.

    Question 1: You have talked much on love, relationships, union, etc. is there a merging between the tao and tantra? Tantra means technique - and Tao can have no relationship with any technique whatsoever. Tao is non-methodological, non-technical. Tao means spon...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  32. No Image

    Isn’t Tantra a way of Indulgence?

    Question 4 : Isn’t Tantra a way of Indulgence? IT IS NOT. It is the ONLY way to get out of indulgence. It is the only way to get out of sexuality. No other way has ever been helpful for man; all other ways have made man more and more sexual. Sex has not disappe...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  33. No Image

    Tantra says do not escape; rather, be aware and move into the objects of enjoyment

    You can force yourself to be non-attached, you can force yourself in the about-turn. You can face the inner world forcibly, you can stand with your back to the world, but just your back to the world is not enough. Your mind may be still moving in the world. It ...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  34. No Image

    Osho on Khajuraho Temples

    Osho on Khajuraho Temples Khajuraho or Konarak — if you meditate there, you will know what the Tantra masters were doing. They were creating in stone something that is felt in the ultimate orgasmic joy. It was the most difficult thing to do, to bring ecstasy in...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  35. No Image

    Buddhist tantrika has to practise the idea of the goddess with the beloved.

    [A sannyasin married couple bring their one-year-old daughter for sannyas.] Deva tara... It means divine star. Tar means star, mm? -- the english word 'star' comes from the sanskrit root 'tara'. In sanskrit it is 'sitara'; from sitara it has become tara in Hind...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  36. No Image

    Inner Man Inner Woman

    Question 1: Osho, I am becoming aware more and more how much i focus on the other, whether it is a friend, a lover, a mountain, or music. one thing remains always the same: the other is a longing within me because without the other, i can never feel complete, r...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  37. No Image

    With no ejaculation, with no throwing energy out, it becomes a meditation

    Tantra says do not try to escape; there is no escape possible. Rather, use nature itself to transcend. Don't fight: accept nature in order to transcend it. If this communion with your beloved or your lover is prolonged with no end in mind, then you can just rem...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  38. No Image

    on overcoming Sex and raising Kundalini

    Question 1 How does one overcome the pull toward Sex so that the Kundalini Can go upward? Energy has been going downward through the sex center continuously for many births, so when any energy is created it will first try to move downward. That is why meditatio...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  39. No Image

    See Your Inner Being in Detail

    See Your Inner Being in Detail The first technique: EYES CLOSED, SEE YOUR INNER BEING IN DETAIL. THUS SEE YOUR TRUE NATURE. Eyes closed… Close your eyes. But this closing is not enough. Total closing means to close your eyes and stop their movements; otherwise ...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  40. No Image

    What is tantric sex?

    Question 2: What is tantric sex? after 'monkey sex' and after 'love-bliss sex', before the highest cosmic and religious sex in which no partner is needed, in which the cosmos is the partner, isn't there tantric sex in which two partners are involved, a sex act ...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  41. No Image

    Tantra Temples in Khajuraho

    Osho on Tantra Temples in Khajuraho The ancient art was not only art; it was, deep down, mysticism. Deep down, it was out of meditation. It was objective, in Gurdjieff's terminology. It was made so that if somebody meditates over it, he starts falling into thos...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  42. No Image

    “Cosmic orgasm” through Tantra

    Before I take your questions some other points have to be clarified, because those points will help you understand more what tantra means. Tantra is not a moral concept. It is neither moral nor immoral. It is amoral. It is a science, and science is neither. You...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  43. No Image

    Tantra: Inner Man Inner Woman

    Tantra: Inner Man Inner Woman There are very few great discoveries in the world. Tantra can claim the greatest discovery. Even after nuclear weapons, tantra's discovery has been standing there for ten thousand years unused; an insight of such great value. The i...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  44. No Image

    I am in favor of love

    Question 4 In the east, it has been stressed that one should stay with a person, one person, in a love relationship. in the west, now people float from one relationship to another. which are you in favor of? I am in favor of love. Let me explain it to you: be t...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  45. No Image

    on the difference between Hindu Tantra and Buddhist Tantra

    on difference in Shiva and Saraha approach towards Tantra Question 1 Is there any difference between the approaches of Shiva and Saraha towards Tantra? NOT REALLY, NOT ESSENTIALLY. But as far as the form is concerned, yes. Religions differ only in the form. Rel...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  46. No Image

    Tantra: Tantra is the natural way to God

    The Tantra attitude about sex is that sex is not a need. It is a cosmic experience, it is an experience of meditation. It is an instinctual return to our ultimate reality, one of the highest forms of meditation. In fifteen minutes to an hour or more of uninterr...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  47. No Image

    Perceive One Being as Knower and Known

    Perceive One Being as Knower and Known Each thing is perceived through knowing. The Self shines in space through knowing. Perceive One Being as knower and known. Whenever you know something, it is known through knowing. The object comes to your mind through the...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  48. No Image

    Man and Woman Together

    To be in contact with someone who is already awake is a must. And to be together with those people who are all thinking to become awake is also a must. This is the meaning of a school method, a group method. Tantra is a group method. It says: Be together. Find ...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  49. No Image

    Tantra: Before You Make Love, Meditate

    The Buddhist and the Hindu Tantra are totally different things. Just the name is the same. If you are confused about them, that can create a very deep conflict in your body. Forget both, mm? because it will be difficult for you to come to a harmony between thes...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  50. No Image

    Transforming Lust with Awareness gives indescribable Bliss

    Passion creates many things in you. It creates fever, it makes you more unconscious — more unconscious than you already are. It drags you deeper into the mud. And with passion come hatred, illusion and desire — and then you are distracted from your nature. Your...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  51. No Image

    Tantra was born as a rebellion - a rebellion against Buddhism, not against Buddha

    Question : How did tantra grow out of buddhism which, as far as i know, views sex as a hindrance to meditation? It is related to the first question. What Buddha said must have been misunderstood. Yes, he said that to go into meditation one has to go beyond sex....
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  52. No Image

    Tantra means the science of falling in love with existence

    [Osho hands Tantra Mridani her sannyas name with the comments] You have a simply far-out name. (laughter) This is your name: Ma Tantra Mridani. Mridani means erotic partner of the cosmic lover (much laughter). Is it not nice? But you can only become a partner o...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  53. No Image

    Sex is the deepest bondage, yet it can be used as a vehicle for the highest freedom.

    Tantra uses sex as a vehicle. It is energy; it can be used as a vehicle. It can transform you, and it can give you transcendental states. But as we are using sex, it looks difficult for us -- because we are using it in a very wrong way, and the wrong way is not...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  54. No Image

    Your sex act and the tantric sex act are basically different. Your sex act is to relieve

    Question 2 How often should one indulge in sex in order to help and not to hinder the meditation process? The question arises because we go on misunderstanding. Your sex act and the tantric sex act are basically different. Your sex act is to relieve; it is just...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  55. No Image

    He Remains in the Subjective Mood

    He Remains in the Subjective Mood The first method: THE APPRECIATION OF OBJECTS AND SUBJECTS IS THE SAME FOR AN ENLIGHTENED AS FOR AN UNENLIGHTENED PERSON. THE FORMER HAS ONE GREATNESS: HE REMAINS IN THE SUBJECTIVE MOOD, NOT LOST IN THINGS. There is a very beau...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  56. No Image

    Spontaneity means: you don’t interfere, you are in a let-go

    FIRST, IN TANTRA, spontaneity is the greatest value – to be just natural, to allow nature to happen. Not to obstruct it, not to hinder it; not to distract it, not to take it in some other direction where it was not going on its own. To surrender to nature, to f...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  57. No Image

    If you are sexual, be sexual; don’t bother about it at all.

    Identification is the root and everything else is nothing but leaves. Being identified with greed, being identified with anger, being identified with sex, is the root. And remember, it is the same whether you are identified with greed, or sex, or even meditatio...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  58. No Image

    Each school, each college, each university, should teach Tantra.

    Question 4: Why am i so afraid of women? and why am i so bored with my wife? All men are afraid of women, and all women are afraid of men. They have good reasons to mistrust each other, since they have been trained from early years to be enemies of each other. ...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  59. No Image

    Orgasm is not a relief: orgasm is a celebration.

    Many people make love but have no idea of what orgasm is, because they are already dissipated. When they are making love, they are empty; when they are making love there is no energy to be shared. When they are making love, they cannot overflow. Their orgasm is...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  60. No Image

    Tantra is the search for the rhythm of opposites

    One of the greatest poets, Walt Whitman, is reported to have said, "I contradict myself because I am big, I contradict myself because I contain all the opposites, because I am all." The same thing can be said about Shiva, about Tantra. Tantra is the search for ...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
  61. No Image

    Touch Has Something That Eyes Cannot Give

    All that is beautiful is inner, and the inner means privacy. Do one thing one day: run the bath and then switch on and off the light. When there is darkness you will hear the water falling more clearly, the sound will be sharp. When the light is on, the sound w...
    CategoryOsho on Tantra
    Read More
Board Pagination Prev 1 Next
/ 1